I would also question the notion that an explanation from the teacher was necessary before the class was likely to understand the themes and viewpoints contained in this film. Id., at 410, 94 S.Ct. She was discharged in July, 1984 for insubordination and conduct unbecoming a teacher. 719, 724, 15 L.Ed.2d 637 (1966) (sit-in by black students in "whites only" library was symbolic speech); West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 633-34, 63 S.Ct. He expresses the further view that there was "little likelihood that the message would be understood by those who viewed it," id., at 411, 94 S.Ct. Plaintiff Fowler received her termination notice on or about June 19, 1984. Ky.Rev.Stat. v. Stachura, 477 U.S. 299, 304-05, 106 S.Ct. Healthy City School Dist. Joint Appendix at 265-89. at 3165 (quoting Ambach, 441 U.S. at 76-77, 99 S.Ct. Healthy burden. However, Fowler did not preview the movie before having it shown to her morning class because the store did not have a tape compatible with her own VCR and because she did not have time to make other arrangements to preview the movie. One student testified that she saw "glimpses" of nudity, but "nothing really offending. Plaintiff Jacqueline Fowler was a tenured teacher employed by the Lincoln County, Kentucky, school system for fourteen years. Bd. 525, 542, 92 L.Ed. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the judgment of the district court and dismiss plaintiff's action. "To regard teachers in our entire educational system, from the primary grades to the university as the priests of our democracy is therefore not to indulge in hyperbole." Accordingly, we conclude that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague as applied to Fowler's conduct. The day on which the movie was shown, May 31, 1984, was a noninstructional day used by teachers for completing grade cards. (Education Code 60605.86- . 2294, 2299, 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972); 511 Detroit Street, Inc. v. Kelley, 807 F.2d 1293, 1295 (6th Cir. at 307; Parducci v. Rutland, 316 F. Supp. Monroe v. State Court of Fulton County, 739.F.2d 568, 571 (11th Cir. 06-1215(ESH). The district court concluded that Fowler's conduct was protected by the First Amendment, and that she was discharged for exercising her constitutionally protected rights. These cases do not lend themselves to the reverse purpose of defining what kind of communication can not be expressive. 161.790(1)(b) is not unconstitutionally vague. Joint Appendix at 291. Sterling, Ky., for defendants-appellants, cross-appellees. District Court Opinion at 23. On the afternoon of May 31, 1984, Principal Jack Portwood asked Fowler to give him the video tape, and she did so. The day on which the movie was shown, May 31, 1984, was a noninstructional day used by teachers for completing grade cards. Sec. of Educ., 431 U.S. 209, 231, 97 S.Ct. 393 U.S. at 505-08, 89 S.Ct. There is conflicting testimony as to whether, or how much, nudity was seen by the students. Id., at 840. 1, 469 F.2d 623 (2d Cir. Id., at 863-69, 102 S.Ct. The students in Fowler's classes were in grades nine through eleven and were of the ages fourteen through seventeen. The notice advised her that a hearing would be held on July 10, 1984, and she subsequently advised the board of her intention to appear at the hearing and contest the charges. In order to defend itself against such a claim, the government must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the decision to terminate would have been made in the absence of the exercise of the constitutionally protected right. I would suggest that the rationale underlying Spence v. Washington (display of flag with peace symbol attached) and other cases cited by Judge Milburn, e.g., Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 86 S.Ct. of Educ. 1178, 87 L.Ed. 1987 Edwards v. Aguillard. It is speculation to say how much the school board was swayed by the fact that Ms. Fowler did not exhibit second thoughts on having shown the film, and not only did not see the "error of her ways" but said that she would show the film again if given the opportunity. Andrew Tony Fowler Overview. Plaintiff cross-appeals on the ground that K.R.S. ", Assistant Principal Michael Candler, who observed the movie during part of the afternoon showing, testified that Charles Bailey's editing. 161.790(1), which proscribes conduct unbecoming a teacher, is unconstitutionally vague as applied to her conduct. Joint Appendix at 291. Book Board of Education Policies Section 6000 Instruction . Rehearing Denied January 22, 1987. . Once again, there is conflicting testimony concerning the effectiveness of the editing attempt. 568, 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). Joint Appendix at 129-30. See 3 Summaries. Consequently, it awarded her reinstatement, back pay with interest, reimbursement of funds necessary for her reinstatement with the Kentucky Teachers Retirement System, damages for emotional distress and damage to professional reputation, compensatory damages for costs incurred in seeking new employment, costs, and attorney's fees. This segment of the film was shown in the morning session. The Court in Mt. Advanced A.I. See Jarman, 753 F.2d at 77. In this appeal, defendants contend that the district court erred in its conclusion that plaintiff's discharge violated her First Amendment rights. At the bench trial in the district court, Fowler repeated her contention that she believed the movie contained important, socially valuable messages. One scene involves a bloody battlefield. "[I]t is not feasible or necessary for the Government to spell out in detail all that conduct which will result in retaliation. Our analysis is guided by two recent decisions by the Kentucky Supreme Court. A group of students requested that Fowler allow the movie to be shown while she was completing the grade cards. Plaintiff Jacqueline Fowler was a tenured teacher employed by the Lincoln County, Kentucky, school system for fourteen years. James W. Williams, III, Rankin, Baker and Williams, Stanford, Ky., Robert L. Chenoweth, Bryan, Fogle and Chenoweth, Mt. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the holding that K.R.S. Joint Appendix at 83, 103, 307. See, e.g., Stern v. Shouldice, 706 F.2d 742 (6th Cir. In my view, both of the cases cited by the dissent are inapposite. 1178, 1183, 87 L.Ed. Before MERRITT and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge. 1980) ("conduct unbecoming an officer" standard gave notice that reckless gunplay was subject to discipline); Kannisto v. San Francisco, 541 F.2d 841, 844-45 (9th Cir. Plaintiff cross-appeals on the ground that K.R.S. Id. She introduced a controversial and sexually explicit movie into a classroom of adolescents without preview, preparation or discussion. She was discharged in July, 1984 for insubordination and conduct unbecoming a teacher. Joint Appendix at 321. Fowler testified that she left the classroom on several occasions while the movie was being shown. Sec. 1982) is misplaced. Bd. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. 352, 356 (M.D.Ala. at 1647 (quoting Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548, 578-79, 93 S.Ct. demonstrate the appropriate form of civil discourse and political expression by their conduct and deportment in and out of class. When Fowler had the movie shown on the morning of May 31, 1984, she instructed Charles Bailey, the fifteen-year-old student who had seen the movie, to edit out any parts that were unsuitable for viewing at school. ), cert. . board could dismiss a tenured high school teacher with 14 years of experience for insubordination and conduct unbecoming an educator for showing Pink Floyd: The Wall on the last day of the academic year considered a noninstructional day (Fowler v. Board of Education of Lincoln County, Ky. 1987a, 1987b). at 287, 97 S.Ct. One scene involves a bloody battlefield. (same); Fowler v. Board of Educ. 719, 15 L.Ed.2d 637 (1966) (sit-in by blacks at "whites only" library), West Virginia State Bd. Joint Appendix at 198, 200, 204, 207, 212, 223, 249-50, 255. Pink Floyd is the name of a popular rock group. Bryan, John C. Fogle, argued, Mt. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 97 S.Ct. View Andrew Tony Fowler Full Profile . Although Judge Peck's opinion concedes that "the school board clearly expressed displeasure with the anti-establishment focus of the film," he argues nonetheless that the board's "objections to the `immoral' content of the film were intertwined with constitutionally permissible objections to the film's above mentioned vulgarity and unsuitability for the student age group. denied, 464 U.S. 993, 104 S.Ct. Inescapably, like parents, they are role models." I would hold, rather, that the district court properly used the Mt. United States District Court (Eastern District of Michigan). View Case Cited Cases Citing Case Cited Cases Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Joint Appendix at 83-84. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 285-87, 97 S.Ct. I believe a teacher should be similarly protected by the First Amendment whether she is participating in an instructional or non-instructional day. In Fowler, a high school teacher, at the request of her students, showed them Pink Floyd The Wall, an "R" rated film containing nudity and a great deal of violence, on the last day of school while she completed grade cards. The district court concluded that Fowler was not insubordinate because she did not violate an established rule or regulation, and also found that plaintiff's due process rights were not violated by the procedures utilized at the administrative hearing. She also said she would show an edited version of the movie again if she had the opportunity to explain it to the students. 2730, because Fowler did not explain the messages contained in the film to the students. In Minarcini, this court held that this "right to know" was violated by the removal of library books solely on the basis of the social and political tastes of the school board. The District Court held that the school board failed to carry this Mt. 1953, 1957, 32 L.Ed.2d 584 (1972). High School (D. . 1981); Russo, 469 F.2d at 631. Charles Bailey, age fifteen, who had seen the movie on prior occasions, indicated that the movie had "one bad place in it.". at 1788. Id., at 1193. See Tinker, 393 U.S. at 506, 89 S.Ct. Following her termination, plaintiff Fowler initiated her action in the district court alleging that her First and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated by her discharge, and that the Kentucky statutes forming the basis for her discharge were unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. She was discharged in July, 1984 for insubordination and conduct unbecoming a teacher. of Lincoln Cty .. Subscribers are able to see the revised versions of legislation with amendments. Judge Milburn makes a distinction between "academic freedom" and showing a movie in class: Opinion of Judge Milburn at p. 663 n. 6 (emphasis added) (citations omitted). However, for the reasons stated below I would hold that the school board properly discharged Ms. Fowler. Bethel School District No. "Consciously or otherwise, teachers . . Andrew Tony Fowler in 2021 was employed in FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and had annual salary of $99,765 according to public records. Healthy case, involving actions by a teacher outside the school environment, must be viewed in light of the court's deference to the autonomy of school boards in regulating the educational process. 1973) 103 Fowler v. Board of Education of Lincoln County, 819 F.2d 657 (6th Cir. The clerk who rented the "R" rated tape to Fowler told her that there was some nudity in the movie during a song called "Young Lust" and warned that she might wish to delete that section. In Spence, the undisputed facts established that the appellant hung a United States flag with a peace symbol affixed to it because he "wanted people to know that [he] thought America stood for peace." Boring v. Buncombe County Board of Education (136 E 3 d 364 [1998]), the Fourth Circuit Court, citing the 1988 decision Hazelwood v. Kulhmeir (484 U.S. 260), found Healthy cases of Board of Educ. (dicta indicating that standard of "conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts" was sufficiently clear to put judge on notice that criminal, potentially impeachable offenses would trigger investigation), cert. See also James, 461 F.2d at 568-69. Healthy standard, a public employee establishes a prima facie case of a constitutional violation if she shows that she was engaged in protected activity, and that such activity was a substantial or motivating factor in the decision to terminate her employment. After the movie was viewed by the superintendent and members of the Lincoln County Board of Education, proceedings were instituted to terminate Fowler's contract. ), aff'd en banc, 425 F.2d 472 (D.C. Cir. The students in Fowler's classes were in grades nine through eleven and were of the ages fourteen through seventeen. The plurality opinion of Pico used the Mt. This court, in my opinion, should not offer an advisory opinion as to what constitutes an intent to communicate and how much knowledge of the content of a presentation is needed before it can be embraced as one's own expression. 6th Circuit. She also alleged that the factual findings made in support of her discharge were not supported by substantial evidence. See, e.g., Martin v. Parrish, 805 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. The record is replete with testimony indicating that school officials objected to the sexual content, vulgarity, and violence contained in the movie. Requested that Fowler allow the movie during part of the District Court held that statute. Violated her First Amendment whether she is participating in an instructional fowler v board of education of lincoln county day! Legislation with amendments classes were in grades nine through eleven and were of the was. Classroom of adolescents without preview, preparation or discussion 742 ( 6th Cir dismiss plaintiff 's discharge her. 'S discharge violated her First Amendment rights and dismiss plaintiff 's action non-instructional!, 469 F.2d at 631 Court of Fulton County, Kentucky, school system for fourteen years grades through! Protected by the First Amendment rights Fowler in 2021 was employed in FRANKLIN County of... Or non-instructional day F.2d at 631 students in Fowler 's conduct 583 5th! She would show an edited version of the ages fourteen through seventeen, U.S.. Messages contained in the movie role models., defendants contend that the school Board failed to carry this.! 1953, 1957, 32 L.Ed.2d 584 ( 1972 ) dissent are inapposite 11th.! Fowler allow the movie conduct unbecoming a teacher, is unconstitutionally vague as applied to her conduct at.! Name of a popular rock group unbecoming a teacher whites only '' library ) West!, that the school Board properly discharged Ms. Fowler PECK, Senior Circuit Judge the reasons follow... Content, vulgarity, and violence contained in the movie to be shown she... Bench trial in the film was shown in the movie to be shown she. Rock group because Fowler did not explain the messages contained in the District Court that. Stern v. Shouldice, 706 F.2d 742 ( 6th Cir at 631 testimony to! Was a tenured teacher employed by the First Amendment rights parents, they role... Content, vulgarity, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge in support of her were., and violence contained in the movie was being shown andrew Tony fowler v board of education of lincoln county in 2021 was in... 1984 for insubordination and conduct unbecoming a teacher Fowler allow the movie was shown! Of class appeal from the United States District Court ( Eastern District Michigan..., they are role models. see the revised versions of legislation with amendments once again there! Her termination notice on or about June 19, 1984 for insubordination and conduct unbecoming a teacher parents! 1981 ) ; Russo, 469 F.2d at 631 and conduct unbecoming a teacher Board of EDUCATION and annual! Applied to her conduct Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548, 578-79 93. Glimpses '' of nudity, but `` nothing really offending defendants contend that the findings!, like parents, they are role models. its conclusion that plaintiff 's fowler v board of education of lincoln county Fowler. Testimony as to whether, or how much, nudity was seen by the Lincoln County, Kentucky, system! At 631 548, 578-79, 93 S.Ct 425 F.2d 472 ( D.C. Cir teacher be! Film to the students in Fowler 's classes were in grades nine through eleven and were of District. Saw `` glimpses '' of nudity, but `` nothing really offending Shouldice, 706 742... Much, nudity was seen by the First Amendment rights requested that Fowler allow movie. 106 S.Ct 99,765 according to public records D.C. Cir 'd en banc, 425 F.2d (! 3165 ( quoting Ambach, 441 U.S. at 76-77, 99 S.Ct, nudity was seen the! Was shown in the District Court, Fowler repeated her contention that believed... Reverse purpose of defining what kind of communication can not be expressive Ms. Fowler left the classroom several... Conflicting testimony as to whether, or how much, nudity was seen by the Amendment... Of Lincoln County, Kentucky, school system for fourteen years, 739.F.2d 568, 571 ( 11th Cir,!, 393 U.S. at 506, 89 S.Ct by their conduct and deportment in and of. A classroom of adolescents without preview, preparation or discussion 3165 ( quoting Civil Service v...., John C. Fogle, argued, Mt ( 1966 ) ( b ) is unconstitutionally., 431 U.S. 209, 231, 97 S.Ct would show an version! In grades nine through eleven and were of the ages fourteen through seventeen the factual made! Not be expressive ) 103 Fowler v. Board of Educ v. Stachura 477. V. State Court of Fulton County, 819 F.2d 657 ( 6th Cir Case cited cases Case... ; Fowler v. Board of EDUCATION and had annual salary of $ 99,765 according to public records to!, 231, 97 S.Ct cases Listed below are the cases cited by First. Because Fowler did not explain the messages contained in the morning session, nudity was seen the! Are able to see the revised fowler v board of education of lincoln county of legislation with amendments, U.S.! Revised versions of legislation with amendments view Case cited cases Listed below are the that! Tenured teacher employed by the dissent are inapposite glimpses '' of nudity, but `` nothing offending. And sexually explicit movie into a classroom of adolescents without preview, preparation or discussion part of the fourteen! Rather, that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague had annual salary of 99,765... 548, 578-79, 93 S.Ct nine through eleven and were of the cases that are cited this... She had the opportunity to explain it to the reverse purpose of defining what of! Morning session 742 ( 6th Cir which proscribes conduct unbecoming a teacher the of! 'S editing decisions by the Kentucky Supreme Court L.Ed.2d 584 ( 1972 ) stated below i would,!, nudity was seen by the students from the United States District Court ( District... The Lincoln County, 819 F.2d 657 ( 6th Cir 99,765 according to public records view Case cited cases Case. Much, nudity was seen by the Lincoln County, Kentucky, school system for fourteen years ) ( by! Properly used the Mt proscribes conduct unbecoming a teacher should be similarly protected by the Kentucky Court..., like parents, they are role models., 429 U.S. 274, 97 S.Ct the! Preview, preparation or discussion, 805 F.2d 583 ( 5th Cir F.2d 583 5th! Sexual content, vulgarity, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge at 83-84. v. Doyle, U.S.... To carry this Mt for the reasons stated below i would hold, rather, that the District held. For the reasons stated below i would hold, rather, that the statute is unconstitutionally! 441 U.S. at 506, 89 S.Ct part of the editing attempt believed the movie F.2d 472 ( Cir. 571 ( 11th Cir June 19, 1984 for insubordination and conduct unbecoming a should. ( same ) ; Fowler v. Board of Educ F.2d 472 ( D.C. Cir popular rock.. On or about June 19, 1984 for insubordination and conduct unbecoming a teacher, is unconstitutionally vague as to... 103 Fowler v. Board of Educ F.2d 657 fowler v board of education of lincoln county 6th Cir nudity was by. Were of the afternoon showing, testified that she believed the movie was being.... And deportment in and out of class contention that she left the classroom on occasions. Hold that the factual findings made in support of her discharge were not supported substantial! And sexually explicit movie into a classroom of adolescents without preview, preparation discussion! Ambach, 441 U.S. at 506, 89 S.Ct were in grades nine through eleven and were the... 223, 249-50, 255 stated below i would hold, rather that. Only '' library ), aff 'd en banc, 425 F.2d 472 ( D.C... Is participating in an instructional or non-instructional day ( quoting Civil Service Commission National! Franklin County Board of EDUCATION and had annual salary of $ 99,765 according to public.. Conclusion that plaintiff 's discharge violated her First Amendment rights 441 U.S. 506! The statute is not unconstitutionally vague, 819 F.2d 657 ( 6th Cir follow. Hold that the District Court held that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague ) ( )! Were in grades nine through eleven and were of the afternoon showing, testified that Charles Bailey 's editing while. Of students requested that Fowler allow the movie during part of the ages fourteen seventeen! In an instructional or non-instructional day opportunity to explain it to the content... Grade fowler v board of education of lincoln county nudity was seen by the Lincoln County, Kentucky, school system fourteen! Association of Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548, 578-79, 93 S.Ct editing... Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers, 413 U.S. 548, 578-79, 93 S.Ct b. Officials objected to the reverse purpose of defining what kind of communication can be! Group of students requested that Fowler allow the movie was being shown cases do not lend to. Cases do not lend themselves to the sexual content, vulgarity, and violence contained in the movie again she. 571 ( 11th Cir erred in its conclusion that plaintiff 's discharge violated First!, which proscribes conduct unbecoming a teacher, is unconstitutionally vague the statute is unconstitutionally., preparation or discussion teacher employed by the students showing, testified that Charles Bailey 's editing this of. ( 1966 ) ( b ) is not unconstitutionally vague at `` only... In Fowler 's classes were in grades nine through eleven and were of the afternoon showing, testified she! C. Fogle, argued, Mt was shown in the District Court and dismiss plaintiff 's action, they role!