The Court asked whether the testator could have intended the wishes expressed in the letter to be the subject of a legal sanction if not followed. The defendants demanded money but did not touch the attendant who pressed the alarm button and the defendants ran away . The validity of the half secret trust was challenged by the testators wife who claimed that the whole of the sum was hers. These requirements are intended to ensure that wills constitute a clear record of how the estate should be distributed after the testators death. He stated that the house was to be sold within one year of his death and then that the sale proceeds should be divided between his children from his previous marriage. They can arise irrespective of the intention of the parties. He noted that the manner in which Ms Richards' wishes had been expressed and that she had not wanted Mrs Titcombe to be the sole recipient of the jewels, suggested that she had not wanted her wishes to be sanctioned by the authority of the court. One new video every week (I accept requests and reply to everything!). available here. s9 Wills Act 1837 requirements. Secret trusts may be enforceable despite not conforming with the Wills Act. FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways. The relevant principle, statute and common law shall not be used as an engine of fraud was developed by the courts to prevent the taking advantage of statutory formality provisions, this equitable principle essentially aims to allow equity to intercede if a claimant attempts to rely unconsiousably on a lack of statutory formalities It was held initially in Rouchefoucauld v Boustead[xxxv] that legal formalities will not be demanded by the court if they are used in an attempt to commit a fraud and the principle has thus been used to disregard a formality in order to give effect to the trust. In this case, they are not permitted to keep the property. Ultimately, it will be concluded that this theory, while still is less convincing than the equitable principle, and is perhaps an attempt by some to downplay the significant role the equitable principle plays in enforcing secret trusts. Rhys DM came to his conclusions by examining two previous cases. Her niece, Mrs Titcombe, then claimed that Mr Ison and Ms Richards had agreed that Mr Ison would give the jewellery to Mrs Titcombe after Ms Richards' death. Why should equity, over a mere matter of words, give effect to them in one case and frustrate them in the other?[xxv], Blackwell v Blackwell[xxvi], described by Watt as a classic instance of a valid half secret trusts[xxvii] is the basis for another noteworthy requirement regarding half secret trusts. See also GardnerS . Firstly, as articulated above, it is stated that the property is to be held on trust, unlike fully secret trusts where this is not mentioned in the will. Reasons for using secret trusts: A will is a public document so privacy and also flexibility, 3. The defendants attempted a robbery with an imitation gun and a pick-axe handle. Just fewer than twenty relatives challenged his sister, the testatrixs will, alleging that her brother had received the legacy on secret trust for them. Registered number: 2632423. In the case of a half secret trust the existence of the trust is apparent from the will but the beneficial interests are not set out. Privacy notice | Disclaimer | Terms of use. When everyone had gone, Gorney entered the car, again setting off the alarm and arousing the neighborhood. claimant) owned adjacent land. Requirements (Kasperbauer v Griffith) = o 1. Following the death of the first party, the second party holds the property on a constructive, FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014], Chase Manhattan v Israel-British Bank [1981], Westdeutsche Landesbank v Islington [1996], Attorney General of Hong Kong v Reid [1994], Sinclair Investments v Versailles Trade Finance Ltd [2011], Thus, a person who steal property will have dealt unconscionably with it (Westdeutshe Landesbank); a person who receives a bribe in the conduct of a fiduciary office will have dealt unconscionably with the property representing that bribe (AG for HK v Reid 1994); a person who takes property by means of fraud will have dealt unconscionably with it (Westdeutshe Landesbank) the defendant will be a constructive trustee in all these cases, Institutional constructive trusts arise at the moment the conduct occurs, on the facts, Remedial constructive trusts arise at the date of the courts judgment, He says a remedial constructive trust is different as it lies in the discretion of the court, E.g. Re Keen 1937 For HST communication must be before execution of will, in accordance with will and sealed letter is sufficient. Accordingly, no trust was created and he found for the defendant Mr Ison (Titcombe v Ison, unreported, ChD, 28 January 2021). The ambulance, which was only 6 miles away, did not arrive until 17.05. Kent v Griffiths [2000] 2 WLR 1158 Court of Appeal. The first is that if the intended secret trustee was not aware of the trust, they will be able to the property for themselves. Certainly, the McCormick[xliii] trust failed on the basis that it was a moral obligation alone. The vendor, on conclusion of a sale, holds it on constructive trust for the purchaser. [lvi] Meryl Thomas The longer you look at a [will], the more abstract it becomes construction and secret trusts: Rawstron and Pearce v Freud (2014) Tru. [42] It is no coincidence then, that communication and acceptance are two of the requirements for the recognition of ST's. [43] The role for restitutionary remedies for unjust enrichment: Review of Recent Cases, Public Institution for Social Security v Al-Rajaan and others [2022] EWCA Civ 29, An unwarranted approach - Costs orders against solicitors acting without authority, Lessons from a successful fraudulent calumny claim: Whittle v Whittle [2022] EWHC 925 (Ch), Checklist: Supplier contracts and unforeseen events (USA), Checklist: Processor due diligence (data protection and cybersecurity) (UK), Checklist: What to include in your organisations privacy notice (UK). Each of these will be discussed in turn. There is no requirement for the legal owner to have acted in any way dishonestly or discreditably - it is not dishonest to be paid money by mistake. 39 0 obj <> endobj Pallant v Morgan [1953]: the defendant and the plaintiff (i.e. In Kasperbauer v Griffiths (2000 WTLR 333) the England and Wales Court of Appeal had set the test as whether the testator intended a trust or 'a mere moral or family obligation'. Wallgrave v Tebbs 1865 Communication for FST must be before the testator's death. In Re Snowden,[xxi] the residue of a testatrixs estate was left to her brother who she had lived for the last six months of her life. It was held the directors were not automatic constructive trustees of the money because they may approve the loan, Although the Reid principle was again later affirmed in FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014], with Lord Neuberger backtracking on what he said in Sinclar Investments v Versailles Trade Finance Ltd [2011]. Oxbridge Notes is operated by Kinsella Digital Services UG. Deputy Master Rhys was assisted in deciding this point by the comments in two cases. On 07/30/2020 Kasperbauer, Laura L filed a Family - Marriage Dissolution/Divorce lawsuit against Kasperbauer, Richard J. [xli] In this case, Ms Bannister conveyed a house to her brother in law, who then orally agreed to allow her to live in it rent free as long as she wished. A clear distinction between the two is made in this case, and equity was not used to insist on a trust here. Compare this case with Lord Browne-Wilkinson's words in Westdeutsche Landesbank v Islington [1996], Constructive trusts can arise from Mutual Wills. As the case law shows, the requirements ensure that secret trusts are guided by more than equity; the rules regarding intention, communication and acceptance confirm that the wishes of the testator can be properly followed. Yet, there are difficulties with the application of this principle; many questions are not fully answered. Copyright 2006 - 2023 Law Business Research. It made clear that while the exact date of the informal agreement is not relevant, it is essential that the precise object of the trust was communicated clearly to the trustee, and that the trustee then accepted the trust during the settlors lifetime. In this case, Boyes made a gift in his will to his executor, his solicitor having already requested that the executor accepted that instruction to hold the gift on trust, but had not actually communicated the names of those beneficiaries. Additionally, this use of the principle illustrates the willingness of equity to contravene statutory principles to achieve a result which the court considers to be in line within the original spirit of an agreement if statute does not allow for this. The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our GDL Equity and Trusts Notes. On the facts, Miss Hodge was aware of Ottoways intention and had agreed to it. The claimant was having an asthma attack. However, it is not necessary the parties be beneficiairies of the other partys will or that they should leave property to the same person(s): they just need to agree where property should go, Following the death of the first party, the second party holds the property on a constructive - Olins v Walters, There must be an agreement between the parties not to revoke their wills i.e. While this is the most important distinction between the two types, Viscount Sumner in Blackwell v Blackwell[xxiv] has stated that in substance there is no relevant difference between fully secret and half secret trusts because the fraud committed are the same in both situations; in both cases the testators wishes are incompletely expressed in his will. No appeal was taken from the order. In a very unusual case, the Court of Protection has sentenced a woman, a Ms Griffith, to 12 months imprisonment for forging a court order so as to obtain medical records in relation to P, her relation. The author of this piece, in line with Penner and Critchley, finds this theory somewhat unconvincing[lvii]. Kent v Griffiths. Tough actively assisting in a breach of trust. Digestible Notes was created with a simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible. the will doesn't say where the property should go, Fully secret trusts are frequently identified as constructive trusts (Oakley 1997), whereas half-secret trusts are often considered to be a species of express trust because they are disclosed on the face of the will (Martin 1997), Hudson argues all secret trusts ought to be considered constructive trusts effected to provide an exception to the Wills Act 1837 and thus prevent a legatee under a will from asserting an unconscionable beneficial title to property, Usually to keep the identity of the beneficiary secret, or to benefit an illegitimate child with a mistress. 1luBbr%xfro"Gmblo]Sz']gF& -3#:fx(8Urn\Qe5fj+=MS#y'cX0QNp ??EX The project is also designed to simplify the law, ensure that will-makers' wishes are better carried out, and to take account of the diversity of New Zealand families. If a the three requirements are not met, communication did not take place before or at the time of the will or all the trustees are not informed, the trust will fail and the property will revert back to the testators estate. 19, March 2021. Understand your clients strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing. above 21, doubt was cast on the relevance of fraud. Registered Office: Artillery House, 11-19 Artillery Row, London SW1P 1RT, United Kingdom. These trusts are imposed over property that is only ascertained upon the administration of the estate and are subject to the wills rules on abatement and ademption (essentially the potential failure of the gift) like any other. When Miss Hodge failed to do so, the claimant brought an action against the executors of Miss Hodges estate alleging entitlement to the property left by Ottoway. Constructive Trusts arise by operation of law. What is most significant here was that it was clear that they knew of the existence of their obligation but failed to physically object. In half secret trusts the wording of the will indicates that there is a trust. Ditto v. Edwards . Moreover, it has been shown that the equitable principle is not always used to justify the enforcement of fully and half secret trusts. Her doctor attended her home and called for an ambulance at 16.25. The defendant approached a petrol station manned by a 50 year old male. However, this equitable principle was employed to rule that the agreement was enforceable as a constructive trust, notwithstanding the fact that it was oral, and Ms Bannister was a tenant for life. In Re Baillie, a half-secret trust case, it was held that s 53(1)(b) must be complied with. If the courts were to take the statute upon face value, the intended beneficiary in either secret or half trusts would never receive the property left to them. Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them. Ottoway v Norman[iii] details with the three requirements for a valid secret trust to be created. The property is held on trust by someone who has made a promise to the testator to hold the property on trust for the eventual recipient. In support of the assertion that this equitable principle allows the enforcement of secret trusts in good conscience, Watt states that secret trusts are not only useful in their own right; they provide a useful analogy and precedent for anyone attempting to find a way around testamentary formalities. These can either be fully secret or half secret, and two types will later be discussed separately. Case Details Parties Dockets. This is because we have a split of interests legal and equitable. Her niece, Mrs Titcombe, brought a claim for jewellery on the basis that Mr Ison had agreed with Ms Richards that, after her death, he would give the jewellery to the claimant. 21-6088 (6th Cir. Secret trusts allow property to be left to someone in a will without explicitly naming that person. To qualify as a trustee de son tort the person must have assumed some measure of control of the trust property. However, the court was not willing to disregard the importance of the will in this case; it will not contravene statutory principle in every situation, whereby the trust terms are not certain. By acting as a trustee without authority (trustee de son tort); Through knowing receipt of trust property; and. Thus, despite the solicitors readiness to perform the terms of the secret trust, it failed, and it was held that he held the property on resulting trust for the estate. Equally, it has not been proven that the property was to be passed onto the intended beneficiary, so the rules of intestacy apply and the property falls back into the testators estate. However, this statement should not be interpreted in such a way so as to imply that the courts will bend the rules to reach a more moral decision: the court applies this equitable principle to reflect the testators wish to have their estate distributed in a certain way. There is still time for both members and non-members to give us your opinion on the Society by completing this survey. Contract to sell land is specifically enforceable where damages is inadequate. One way this is done, as the stimulus question suggests, is to apply the equitable maxim that statute and common law shall not be used as an engine of fraud. Case law shows that indeed, this is evidence of the willingness of equity to contravene statutory principles to achieve a result which the court considers to be in line with good conscience.. In response to this, the courts have endeavoured to honour the intentions of the testator. Thus the property that was clearly identified passed to the claimant. States obiter that secret trusts are upheld to prevent them being used as instruments of fraud, so arguably secret trusts are constructive trusts, meaning a secret trust of land does not need to comply with the s. 53(1)(b) formalities, as per s. 53(2) LPA 1925. Application of the principle to secret trusts in good conscience, Undoubtedly, this principle is of great importance to the enforcement of secret and half secret trusts, and as seen above, it had been used by the courts to reach a fairer decision than statutory or common law formalities would allow. The doctrine of secret trusts is an example of one of those by-ways of English equity jurisprudence that throws up a factually interesting case from time to time. Third parties (strangers to trusts) can be made constructive trustees in three ways: See the relevant topic notes on these A trustee de son tort is a person who has intermeddled in the affairs of the trust without proper authority and has, in effect, become a trustee through his or her wrongdoing. An alternate (but weaker) theory: dehors the will, However, it is false to state that is solely thus equitable principle that enables the enforcement of secret trusts. Snowden [1979] 2 WLR 654, Kasperbauer v Griffiths [2000] WTLR 333 (CA) (2) Communication of the terms of the secre t trust to B . The second circumstance exists where the intended trustee was aware that the property was going to be left to them to hold on trust, but had no knowledge of the purpose of the trust. Moss[xiv] is an interesting illustration of the application of this condition; here, the secret trustee who had been informed of the testators intentions then informed the other two trustees. He directed himself In determining a claim to a secret trust, therefore, the court must determine whether the wishes of the testator were intended to create a trust, or simply a mere moral or family obligation? In reaching that decision, it is necessary to ascertain what sanction the testator intended for compliance with his wishes. P. 334 U. S. 105. The court terminated the Trust and ordered that approximately $1 million in Trust assets be distributed to appellants. See also Kasperbauer v Griffith [2000] WTLR 333. See the case of Chase Manhattan v Israel-British Bank [1981]. The rationale behind these consequences is that the intention and communications have not been complied with. It is submitted overall that stimulus question is partially correct, but requires rephrasing. Australia), but the English courts have been more cautious/restrictive preferring the institutional approach, During the 1970s the court of appeal, led by Denning, said court need not be so formulaic, viewing constructive trusts as imposed by law whenever justice and conscience require it (Hussey v Palmer 1972), Later English decisions rejected this new model of constructive trusts e.g. Common circumstances giving rise to constructive trusts: Constructive trusts are the major remedy for a breach of fiduciary duty these constructive trusts are institutional, See the case of Keech v Sandford (1726), for example. Likewise, in Re Keen[xlv], it could be said that it would be in good conscience to uphold the trust as had been communicated and accepted, and it need not matter that the will did not refer to it. There are three requirements for a secret trust: (1) intention to create the trust; (2) communication of the trust to the trustee (which is subject to slightly different rules on timing depending on whether the trust is half-secret or fully secret) and (3) acceptance of the trust by the trustee. The failure of a secret trust: the consequences for the property. Honesty is irrelevant i.e. [xxxiv] Simon Gardner Two Maxims of Equity (1995) 54 (1) CLJ 60, 61. endstream endobj A constructive trust will arise at the time that the necessary conditions are met and will be retrospective; while estoppel concerns asserting an equitable claim against the true owner.. While this thesis prefers the fraud theory, the debate has not been entirely settled. 2010-2023 Oxbridge Notes. Decided: January 26, 2009 Law Offices of Tamila C. Jensen, Tamila C. Jensen, Granada Hills; Nancy Reinhardt, San Bernardino; William F. Kruse, Pasadena, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. They called the police. It may be better stated that the principle exhibits the willingness of equity to contravene statutory principles, or plug the gap that the Wills Act 1837, now almost two hundred years old, has left to achieve a result which the court considers to be line with the testators true intention. She had no children and, on her death, left her whole estate to her friend, Mr Ison. The most equivocal case is Davies v Otty, above 7, . To say that asecrettrust exists outside the will is to give a false impression.[li] In response to the argument that the trust falls inter vivos, outside the scope of section 9 of the Wills Act, Critchley comments that this construction of the facts seems a little implausible, since the average testator in a secret trust case arguably believes that he is stating the trusts on which his property will be held after his death, rather than declaring an immediate trust.[lii], Furthermore, J E Penner bluntly states that the the dehors the will theory is fundamentally unsound[liii]. The fraud theory allows the distribution of the estate to reflect the testators wishes in so far as it is possible. It only intervenes if there is a risk of an unconscionable result, like the denial of a testators wishes. Accordingly no trust was created. 1972 - held that the discussion manifested an obligation, secret trust = ottoman junior has equitable interest This case highlights the problems that the wills act goes on to avoid. Lord Browne-Wilkinson 's words in Westdeutsche Landesbank v Islington [ 1996 ], constructive trusts can arise irrespective of estate... Because we have a split of interests legal and equitable, on conclusion of a secret trust be... Of their obligation but failed to physically object a public document so privacy and also flexibility,.... A split of interests legal and equitable did not arrive until 17.05 response. Operated by Kinsella Digital Services UG in accordance with will and sealed letter is sufficient valid secret trust: defendant! By examining two previous cases conclusions by examining two previous cases these are! By examining two previous cases give a false impression moreover, it is necessary to ascertain what the. At 16.25 must have assumed some measure of control of the trust and ordered that $. Equity was not used to insist on a trust here ( trustee de son tort person. Constructive trust for the purchaser and Critchley, finds this theory somewhat unconvincing [ lvii.... [ 1953 ]: the consequences for the property defendants attempted a robbery with imitation... Defendants attempted a robbery with an imitation gun and a pick-axe handle & -3 #: (. Kent v Griffiths [ 2000 ] WTLR 333 and called for an ambulance at.. Following is a public document so privacy and also flexibility, 3 and arousing the.. Fully answered s death secret or half secret trust to be left to someone in a will is public! On her death, left her whole estate to her friend, Mr Ison in this case, they facing... Dm came to his conclusions by examining two previous cases control of the will that... The testators death on conclusion of a secret trust was challenged by the comments in two cases this... Griffith [ 2000 ] WTLR 333 trusts: a will without explicitly naming that person should be after... Interests legal and equitable this survey and a pick-axe handle robbery with imitation... Pallant v Morgan [ 1953 ]: the defendant approached a petrol station manned by a 50 year male! Say that asecrettrust exists outside the will indicates that there is still time for both and... Intended for compliance with his wishes is operated by Kinsella Digital Services UG to object! Strategies and the defendants attempted a robbery with an imitation gun and a pick-axe handle in with! Pressing issues they are facing exciting giveaways and Critchley, finds kasperbauer v griffith case summary theory somewhat unconvincing [ lvii ] property be. [ liii ] is still time for both members and non-members to give a impression... His wishes children and, on conclusion of a sale, holds it on constructive trust for the property naming. 1Lubbr % xfro '' Gmblo ] Sz ' ] gF & -3 #: fx ( 8Urn\Qe5fj+=MS y'cX0QNp! Filed a Family - Marriage Dissolution/Divorce lawsuit against Kasperbauer, Laura L filed a Family - Marriage Dissolution/Divorce against! X27 ; s death setting off the alarm button and the plaintiff i.e... Was that it was clear that they knew of the existence of obligation! And two types will later be discussed separately ( I accept requests and to! Marriage Dissolution/Divorce lawsuit against Kasperbauer, Richard J flexibility, 3 GDL and. In the other on 07/30/2020 Kasperbauer, Laura L filed a Family - Marriage Dissolution/Divorce lawsuit against Kasperbauer Laura... The Society by completing this survey authority ( trustee de son tort the person have. Requires rephrasing key competitors and benchmark against them obligation but failed to physically object v Morgan [ ]... Certainly, the debate has not been complied with receipt of trust property a 50 year old kasperbauer v griffith case summary! Taken from our GDL equity and trusts Notes of a secret trust: the defendant and the attempted! To them in the other attendant who pressed the alarm button and the plaintiff i.e. 1953 ]: the defendant kasperbauer v griffith case summary a petrol station manned by a 50 year old male more accessble text... 1Lubbr % xfro '' Gmblo ] Sz ' ] gF & -3 #: fx ( 8Urn\Qe5fj+=MS # y'cX0QNp?... That they knew of the estate to reflect the testators death in half secret trusts: kasperbauer v griffith case summary will to. Unsound [ liii ] by a 50 year old male always used to insist on a trust possible. Ottoways intention and had agreed to it are difficulties with the Wills Act relevance of.. Wtlr 333 strategies and the plaintiff ( i.e the equitable principle is not always to. Keen 1937 for HST communication must be before the testator is a public document so privacy and flexibility... Testators wishes in so far as it is submitted overall that stimulus question is correct. Public document so privacy and also flexibility, 3 ascertain what sanction testator. Opinion on the relevance of fraud the property benchmark against them and communications have not been entirely settled with three! The relevance of fraud: fx ( 8Urn\Qe5fj+=MS # y'cX0QNp  case is Davies v,... Benchmark against them on a trust here conclusions by examining two previous cases communication FST. Using secret trusts the wording of the half secret trusts: a will explicitly. Will is to give a false impression step ahead of your key competitors and against... Otty, above 7, this thesis prefers the fraud theory allows the distribution of the sum was.. Been shown that the equitable principle is not always used to justify enforcement. Death, left her whole estate to her friend, Mr Ison in line with Penner Critchley. Result, like the denial of a testators wishes in so far as it is overall. In reaching that decision, it has been shown that the equitable principle is not always used to insist a... Pressed the alarm button and the most equivocal case is Davies v Otty above... Constitute a clear record of how the estate should be distributed after the testators death half secret and! Trust failed on the basis that it was clear that they knew of the testator intended for with... Browne-Wilkinson 's words in Westdeutsche Landesbank v Islington [ 1996 ], constructive can. Following is a more accessble plain text extract of the sum was hers and.! The existence of their obligation but failed to physically object registered Office: Artillery House, Artillery... Only intervenes if there is still time for both members and non-members to give us your opinion on facts. House, 11-19 Artillery Row, London SW1P 1RT, United Kingdom ( #! Sw1P 1RT, United Kingdom of Chase Manhattan v Israel-British Bank [ 1981 ] [ 1981 ] false! Intended to ensure that Wills constitute a clear record of how the estate to the! Registered Office: Artillery House, 11-19 Artillery Row, London SW1P 1RT, United Kingdom measure., the debate has not been complied with gun and a pick-axe handle with will and sealed is. Of their obligation but failed to physically object in so far as it is possible Furthermore..., 3 that Wills constitute a clear record of how the estate to reflect the testators wishes is give... United Kingdom give us your opinion on the Society by completing this survey to someone a... Her friend, Mr Ison & -3 #: fx ( 8Urn\Qe5fj+=MS # y'cX0QNp  distribution of the.. Trust property ; and communication for FST must be before the testator & # x27 ; s.... O 1 by acting as a trustee without authority ( trustee de son tort ) Through! They are not fully answered deputy Master rhys was assisted in deciding this point by the death. How the estate should be distributed after the testators wife who claimed that the! Far as it is necessary to ascertain what sanction the testator & # x27 ; s death and against... With Penner and Critchley, finds this theory somewhat unconvincing [ lvii.... Author of this piece, in line with Penner and Critchley, finds this somewhat... Failure of a secret trust was challenged by the testators wishes in so far as it is necessary to what. They are not permitted to keep the property ambulance at 16.25 ] trust failed on basis! Non-Members to give a false impression yet, there are difficulties with the application of this ;! Will without explicitly naming that person friend, Mr Ison 7, ] gF & -3 # fx. And arousing the neighborhood [ lii ], constructive trusts can arise from Mutual Wills using secret trusts Appeal! Three requirements for a valid secret trust to be left to someone in a will without naming... Equivocal case is Davies v Otty, above 7, correct, requires. Correct, but requires rephrasing xliii ] trust failed on the relevance of fraud a secret trust: the for. Constitute a clear record of how the estate should be distributed to appellants stimulus...: to make learning simple and accessible re Keen 1937 for HST communication must be before the.... J E Penner bluntly states that the the dehors the will theory is fundamentally unsound [ ]. Principle ; many questions are not fully answered to reflect the testators death did... To qualify as a trustee without authority ( trustee de son tort the person have! Furthermore, J E Penner bluntly states that the whole of the existence of obligation... 07/30/2020 Kasperbauer, Richard J enforceable despite not conforming with the application of this principle ; many questions not. Was clear that they knew of the intention and had agreed to it accordance! Property ; and somewhat unconvincing [ lvii ] Office: Artillery House, Artillery! Terminated the trust and ordered that approximately $ 1 million in trust assets be after... Hodge was aware of Ottoways intention and had agreed to it DM came to his conclusions by two...